Obama Is Gay

McCain is a dried up old prune. Vote Obama!

2008/7/19

Obama Says Jesus Justified Same Sex Marriage

@ 12:59 PM (1 month, 10 days ago)
 
(CNSNews.com) - The wife of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama told  a crowd of homosexual activists last week that her husband wants to repeal the  Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and reverse the rule on homosexuals in the  military. Michelle Obama also drew parallels with homosexual advocacy groups and  the civil rights movement, referring to events "from Selma to Stonewall."
Speaking to the Democratic National Committee's Gay and Lesbian Leadership  Committee last Thursday in New York City, Michelle Obama said her husband  supports "a world where federal laws don't discriminate against same-sex  relationships, including equal treatment for any relationship recognized under  state law."
"That is why he supports robust civil unions," she said. "That is why he has  said the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to  decide for themselves how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples --  whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union or a civil marriage."
The Illinois senator has spoken little about homosexual issues on the campaign  trail, but a position paper on his Web site http://tinyurl.com/5dhpx6 says that  Obama wants to "fully repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation  that would ensure 1,100-plus federal legal rights and benefits currently  provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in  civil unions and other legally recognized unions."
The DOMA has two parts: one defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and  the second part says a homosexual marriage in one state does not have to be  recognized in another state.
Such a law could have added impetus since the California Supreme Court ruled  last month to legally recognize homosexual marriages. Meanwhile, Massachusetts,  Connecticut, Vermont, New Jersey, and New Hampshire have enacted legal unions  for homosexual couples either through legislation or court order.
The absence of a federal law could mean that the more than 40 states that have  bans -- either constitutional or in statute -- on same-sex marriage would be  required to recognize a homosexual marriage license from another state as a  legally binding contract.
Sen. Obama's position paper was likely referencing the federal definition  provision that would extend Social Security and other government benefits to  same-sex couples, said Lynn Wardle, a law professor at Brigham Young University.  Nonetheless, this could effectively nationalize same-sex marriage, Wardle said.
"If a judge in San Francisco says 'for Social Security purposes, that's the  law,' then a trial judge in San Francisco could affect the whole country,"  Wardle told Cybercast News Service.
"A marriage is valid where it's performed and valid everywhere, with one  exception, if it violates public policy," she said. "As a political move, this  would inevitably mean gay marriage in most states. It's a step in nationalizing  gay marriage."
Republican presidential candidate John McCain voted for DOMA in 1996 as a  federal law. However, the Arizona senator voted with Obama in opposing a federal  constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman. McCain  said his opposition was on grounds of federalism, believing that states should  decide on the matter.
In 2006, McCain supported a proposed constitutional amendment in his home state  of Arizona to define marriage as only for heterosexual couples, but the  amendment failed on the November ballot.
McCain's Web site http://tinyurl.com/2n2xxj reads: "The family represents the  foundation of Western Civilization and civil society and John McCain believes  the institution of marriage is a union between one man and one woman. It is only  this definition that sufficiently recognizes the vital and unique role played by  mothers and fathers in the raising of children, and the role of the family in  shaping, stabilizing, and strengthening communities and our nation."
Mrs. Obama began her New York speech praising the Lawrence v. Texas ruling by  the U.S. Supreme Court five years ago that struck down Texas's anti-sodomy law,  and said "same-sex couples would never again be persecuted through the use of  criminal law."
In comparing the homosexual rights movement with civil rights, Mrs. Obama  commented on how far things have come.
"We are all only here because of those who marched and bled and died, from Selma  to Stonewall," Mrs. Obama said in reference to Selma, Ala., and the Stonewall  Inn in New York City.
Selma, Ala., was the starting point in March 1965 for one of the most famous  civil rights marches of the movement. The Stonewall Inn, a bar in Greenwich  Village, was the site of what many consider the start of the homosexual rights  movement in June 1969, when gays and lesbians rioted against police officers.
She also said her husband believes in "a world where together we work to reverse  discriminatory laws like DOMA and 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'"
Mrs. Obama said her husband helped get protection for people qualified as  lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender in the Illinois Human Rights Act when he  was a state senator.
"In 2004, after hearing from gay friends and supporters about the hurtful impact  of DOMA, Barack went on record during his U.S. Senate race and called for its  complete repeal," she said. "And as a U.S. senator, he voted to protect our  Constitution from the stain of discrimination by voting against the federal  marriage amendment."
Mrs. Obama told the gathering her husband has taken this message even to  religious groups. In a previous interview, Barack Obama said he believed that  Jesus' Sermon on the Mount http://tinyurl.com/2m2z9z justified same-sex unions.

Comment(s) »

  1. He might not be a Muslim (even though he was schooled as one) but Obomba sure ain't Christian.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/07/19 @ 01:02 PM — (Reply)

  2. I heard he converted from Muslim when he found out they chop off gays' heads.

    Comment by The Dudeler— 2008/07/19 @ 01:04 PM — (Reply)

  3. Do you agree with Obama, Ed?

    Comment by The Dudeler— 2008/07/19 @ 07:15 PM — (Reply)

  4. Let's put it this way Dugg. I suppose all illegal aliens and gays can be exterminated or accepted for what they are. I think option #2 is what Christ would choose.

    Comment by Ed— 2008/07/19 @ 08:52 PM — (Reply)

  5. Who said anything about extermination? Not me.

    How about giving them some sort of civil union without stomping all over a religious ceremony and calling it marriage?

    Comment by The Dudeler— 2008/07/19 @ 08:57 PM — (Reply)

  6. Dugg...how does any of it affect you?

    Comment by Ed— 2008/07/19 @ 09:01 PM — (Reply)

  7. It's my faith. When I see it spit on it effects me.

    Comment by The Dudeler— 2008/07/19 @ 09:13 PM — (Reply)

  8. My Faith my belief that Homos are an un natural act ! where is it that even nature accepts un natural acts as if it were natural ? It doesnt and it never will ! My name is Lott and I live in Saddom and Gamorah ! Located right here in the good ole U.S.A. ! There's a guy down the street and he's building like this giant boat made out of wood. The City inspector was outside his place with a ticket for him for city code ordinance violation ! hahahaaa

    Comment by jim— 2008/07/19 @ 09:42 PM — (Reply)

  9. Vote for John McCain for President !

    Comment by jim— 2008/07/19 @ 09:43 PM — (Reply)

  10. Comment by The Dudeler— 2008/07/20 @ 10:16 AM — (Reply)

  11. Dugg your photoshopping is definitely well spent provided you are selling some of this crap commercially. Otherwise you should be cutting your lawn.

    Comment by Ed— 2008/07/20 @ 10:19 AM — (Reply)

  12. The $ is just rolling in -:roll:

    Comment by The Dudeler— 2008/07/20 @ 12:06 PM — (Reply)

  13. Good for you. You many lawns DO you cut?

    Comment by Ed— 2008/07/20 @ 12:59 PM — (Reply)

  14. hey, ed your blog is funny.obama being gay

    Comment by mos— 2008/07/23 @ 04:26 PM — (Reply)

  15. I didn't make this one, Ed. Lifted it off Freakingnews.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/07/20 @ 01:33 PM — (Reply)

  16. Oh. That must make if "varafiable". HAHAHAHA

    Comment by Ed— 2008/07/20 @ 01:43 PM — (Reply)

  17. You know and I know and your milkman knows this is yet another Dugg blog therefore lacks credibility.

    Comment by Ed— 2008/07/23 @ 09:43 PM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically